Skip to main content
Get the Weekly ESG Brief

Activision Blizzard

AB1NYSETrackedESG Rated: 1/2 ProvidersCommunication ServicesDiversifiedSustainalytics: 13.8 · Low

Market Quote Unavailable · Potential Inactive / Delisted Ticker

Public exchange feeds are not currently returning active trading data for Activision Blizzard (AB1). This company may be delisted, bankrupt, acquired, or halted. To preserve data integrity, prices are never displayed as $0.00. Sourced ESG ratings and sustainability disclosures remain cataloged below.

Coverage
Rated universe Carries an MSCI or Sustainalytics observation.
ESG profile reviewed
Last editorial update to this profile.
Quote
Market data unavailableObservation time is shown beside the price.
Methodology
How we rateProvider ratings are shown separately, never blended.

Market overview

Market data unavailable

Massive Stock Widgets has not returned a current, verifiable snapshot for Activision Blizzard (nyse:AB1). Check again later.

Company Profile & Business Model Overview

Activision Blizzard is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive entertainment content and services, known for massive franchises like Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, and Candy Crush. Acquired by Microsoft in October 2023, the company operates across console, PC, and mobile platforms, reaching hundreds of millions of monthly active users worldwide. It functions through key divisions including Activision Publishing, Blizzard Entertainment, and King Digital Entertainment.

Sustainability Strengths & Catalysts (Pros)

  • Strong commitment to climate action, including a target to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and investments in renewable energy to power its data centers.
  • Tangible steps toward better workplace inclusion and transparency, highlighted by the release of its first comprehensive Transparency Report in 2023 and reported increases in women and non-binary representation in the workforce.
  • Active efforts to reduce environmental impact in its supply chain, such as the ongoing elimination of single-use plastics from its physical game packaging.

Material Risks & Governance Concerns (Cons)

  • A highly publicized history of a toxic, inequitable workplace culture that resulted in a $54 million settlement with the California Civil Rights Department over allegations of systemic sexual harassment and gender discrimination.
  • Severe historical failures in corporate governance, culminating in a $35 million SEC penalty for violating whistleblower protection rules and lacking adequate internal controls to analyze and disclose employee misconduct complaints to investors.

Related ESG Peer Equities

Companies in Communication Services evaluated across carbon intensity, social metrics, and board governance.

Explore Communication Services Peers →

ESG & Sustainability Rating Breakdown

Synthesized multi-provider rating across Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance dimensions.

Audited Methodology

MSCI ESG Rating

N/A
Sustainalytics Risk Score

13.8

Low

Data integrity and methodology

MSCI and Sustainalytics ratings are shown separately with their own observation dates; they are not blended into one score, and providers can disagree. Market quotes are delayed or last-close values, and every snapshot states its source and observation time. Read the full rating methodology.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Direct answers on sustainability scores, risk methodologies, and peer rankings.

What is Activision Blizzard (AB1)'s ESG rating and sustainability score?

Activision Blizzard (AB1) carries a Sustainalytics ESG Risk Score of 13.8, measuring unmanaged corporate ESG risk on a scale of 0 to 50+.

Is Activision Blizzard considered an ESG leader or laggard in Communication Services?

Independent benchmark status for Activision Blizzard is evaluated relative to Communication Services peers once third-party coverage publishes official methodology scores.

What are the main ESG risks and controversies for Activision Blizzard?

Key material risks for Activision Blizzard include: A highly publicized history of a toxic, inequitable workplace culture that resulted in a $54 million settlement with the California Civil Rights Department over allegations of systemic sexual harassment and gender discrimination.; Severe historical failures in corporate governance, culminating in a $35 million SEC penalty for violating whistleblower protection rules and lacking adequate internal controls to analyze and disclose employee misconduct complaints to investors.. Investors should evaluate whether corporate mitigation plans adequately address these vulnerabilities.

How does The Impact Investor evaluate ESG stock profiles?

The Impact Investor presents audited third-party ratings from MSCI and Sustainalytics alongside delayed market data and financial fundamentals. We do not blend ratings into proprietary black-box scores, and ratings are never modified by advertising or affiliate relationships.