Best Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: 2026 List and Fees
Nine socially responsible mutual funds are worth shortlisting in 2026, and the cheapest two cost the same: the Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and the Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFTAX) both charge a 0.11% expense ratio. FITLX has no minimum investment; VFTAX asks $3,000. If you want an active manager, Parnassus Core Equity Investor (PRBLX) charges 0.81% with a $2,000 minimum. For bonds, the Nuveen Core and Impact Bond Fund charges 0.35% in its R6 share class (TSBIX).
One warning before the list: four of the funds that appear on most “best SRI funds” pages have been renamed or re-benchmarked since 2022, and Morningstar counted 97 closures of U.S. sustainable funds in 2025 alone. Check the ticker and the current prospectus before you buy anything from any list, including this one.
Which socially responsible mutual funds are worth a look in 2026?
These nine are open-end mutual funds, not exchange-traded funds, and every one applies a published environmental, social and governance screen. Expense ratios and minimums below were taken from each fund company’s own disclosures in early August 2026. Expense ratios change; minimums differ by brokerage platform.
| Fund | Ticker | Style | Expense ratio | Minimum | What it screens for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund | FITLX | Index, U.S. large blend | 0.11% | $0 | Tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders Index |
| Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Admiral | VFTAX | Index, U.S. large/mid blend | 0.11% | $3,000 | Tracks the FTSE US Choice Index; excludes fossil fuels, weapons, tobacco, gambling |
| Nuveen Core and Impact Bond Fund | TSBIX (R6), TSBRX (A) | Active, intermediate core bond | 0.35% (R6), 0.67% (A) | Varies by class and platform | ESG leaders plus direct-impact bonds: affordable housing, community development, renewables |
| Calvert Bond Fund | CSIBX (A) | Active, core-plus bond | 0.73% | $1,000 | Calvert Principles for Responsible Investment |
| AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund | ATEYX (Advisor) | Active, global large growth | 0.79% | Advisor class, eligibility applies | Themes mapped to the UN Sustainable Development Goals |
| Parnassus Core Equity Fund Investor | PRBLX | Active, U.S. large blend | 0.81% | $2,000 ($50 after) | Excludes fossil fuels, nuclear, tobacco, alcohol, gambling, weapons |
| 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund | SSIAX (A), LMRNX (I) | Active, balanced (about 68% equity) | 0.95% (A), 0.69% (I) | Class A carries up to a 5.75% sales charge | Employment practices, human rights, no fossil fuel reserves or weapons |
| Domini Impact Equity Fund Investor | DSEFX | Active, U.S. large growth | 1.04% | $2,500 ($1,500 for IRAs or with automatic investing) | Domini standards plus shareholder engagement |
| Shelton Sustainable Equity Fund | NEXTX | Active, mid-cap growth | 1.25% | Varies by platform | Shelton PRIME criteria for the sustainable economy |
The spread between the cheapest and most expensive fund on that list is 1.14 percentage points. On a $50,000 balance that is $570 a year, every year, before any difference in what the manager actually picks.
What is a socially responsible mutual fund?
A socially responsible mutual fund is a pooled fund that applies social, environmental or governance rules to the securities it can hold, on top of the usual financial analysis. ESG investing, sustainable investing and socially conscious investing all describe the same family of funds. What separates the types of funds inside that family is the method, and the label on the tin rarely tells you which method you are buying.
- Exclusion screens remove whole categories, usually fossil fuel reserves, weapons, tobacco, alcohol and gambling. VFTAX works this way.
- Best-in-class ESG screens keep the sectors and hold the companies with the strongest ESG scores inside each one. FITLX and its MSCI USA ESG Leaders index work this way, which is why an oil-free portfolio is not what you get.
- Impact strategies buy securities with a traceable use of proceeds, such as an affordable housing bond. The Nuveen Core and Impact Bond Fund is the clearest example on this list.
Those three approaches produce very different portfolios. An exclusion fund and a best-in-class ESG fund can both call themselves sustainable and share almost no holdings, so two people who both wanted to align with their values can end up owning opposite things. Read the strategy section of the prospectus before you trust the fund name. Our guide to socially responsible investing covers the philosophies in more depth, and what ESG actually measures explains the scoring behind them.
The screening process behind these products is more mechanical than the marketing suggests. A data provider scores companies on ESG factors drawn from public filings and business practices, an index or a manager sets a threshold, and whatever clears the threshold is eligible. Climate exposure is usually the loudest factor and the one an individual investor cares most about, but labor standards, board composition and controversy history all feed the same score. That is why two sustainable investments built on different data sets can disagree about the same company.
Which SRI funds are index funds rather than actively managed?
Two on this list: FITLX and VFTAX. Both are index mutual funds, both charge 0.11%, and both hold large U.S. companies. The difference is the index. FITLX follows MSCI USA ESG Leaders, a best-in-class screen. VFTAX follows the FTSE US Choice Index, which is exclusion-led and drops fossil fuel reserves, civilian firearms, tobacco, alcohol, gambling and nuclear power.
If you have seen VFTAX described as tracking the FTSE4Good US Select Index, that name is out of date. FTSE renamed the benchmark to the FTSE US Choice Index effective February 6, 2024. The fund did not change; the index label did. We cover the fund itself in more detail in our VFTAX review.
The rest of the funds here are actively managed, which is where the 0.79% to 1.25% expense ratios come from. You are paying fund managers to pick stocks or bonds and, in several cases, to practice shareholder activism: voting proxies, filing resolutions and pressing boards on corporate governance, ESG issues and environmental impact rather than simply choosing to divest. Active managers also frame the screen as risk management: their argument is that companies with weak environmental or governance records carry liabilities that show up in financial performance eventually. Whether that engagement is worth the fee is a judgment call, and our piece on whether ESG investments outperform lays out the evidence on both sides.
What are the best socially responsible bond funds?
Two on this list hold bonds rather than stocks. The Nuveen Core and Impact Bond Fund is the cheaper of the two at 0.35% in the R6 class (TSBIX), and it is the only fund here that allocates deliberately to bonds with a measurable use of proceeds: affordable housing, community and economic development, renewable energy and natural resources. Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) charges 0.73% in its Class A shares with a $1,000 minimum, and applies the Calvert Principles across a core-plus portfolio.
The Nuveen fund carries a naming trap that catches most older lists. It launched as the TIAA-CREF Social Choice Bond Fund, became the Nuveen Core Impact Bond Fund on May 1, 2024, and became the Nuveen Core and Impact Bond Fund on August 1, 2026 when Teachers Advisors merged into Nuveen Asset Management. The ticker TSBIX survived all of it, but it now denotes the R6 share class. If a page still calls TSBIX the “TIAA-CREF Social Choice Bond Fund,” that page has not been checked since 2024.
Which SRI funds were renamed or re-benchmarked since 2022?
Four changes account for most of the outdated information circulating about this category. Each one leaves the ticker intact, so a stale list looks correct until you search the fund name and find nothing.
| Ticker | Name or benchmark you may still see | What it is now | When it changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSBIX | TIAA-CREF Social Choice Bond Fund, Institutional Class | Nuveen Core and Impact Bond Fund, R6 Class | May 1, 2024, then August 1, 2026 |
| NEXTX | Shelton Green Alpha Fund | Shelton Sustainable Equity Fund, with a revised objective | December 20, 2022 |
| VFTAX | Tracks the FTSE4Good US Select Index | Tracks the FTSE US Choice Index (same index, new name) | February 6, 2024 |
| SPYX | SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF, and it is an ETF, not a mutual fund | State Street ETF rebranding, 2026 |
Holdings go stale faster than names. Two examples from lists still online: the AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund is often described as holding SVB Financial Group, whose bank failed in March 2023, when its largest positions as of late July 2026 were NVIDIA at 5.37%, Alphabet at 5.17%, Apple at 4.98% and Taiwan Semiconductor at 3.92%. The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is often described as holding Siemens Gamesa, which stopped trading as a separate company after Siemens Energy took it private, when its largest positions as of July 14, 2026 were Bloom Energy at 12.75%, First Solar at 8.45%, China Yangtze Power at 6.72% and Enphase Energy at 4.79%.
Why is the sustainable fund menu shrinking?
Because money has been leaving the category for three straight years and fund companies close what does not gather assets. Morningstar recorded 97 closures of U.S. sustainable funds during 2025, with closures outpacing launches every quarter since late 2023, and 2025 marked the third consecutive year of net outflows from U.S. sustainable funds. Globally, roughly $84 billion left sustainable funds in 2025, the first full year of net redemptions since Morningstar began tracking the segment in 2018.
This is not only a small-provider story. Fidelity closed four sustainable exchange-traded funds in late 2025: the Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond ETF, the Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond ETF, the Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Equity ETF and the Fidelity Women’s Leadership ETF.
The practical consequence is worth understanding before you buy. A fund that liquidates sells its holdings and returns cash, which can trigger a taxable gain in a brokerage account at a moment you did not choose. That makes fund size a real screening criterion in this category. The 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund held $901.9 million as of June 30, 2026; the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF held about $2.42 billion; SPYX held about $2.56 billion in May 2026. Very small funds carry more closure risk.
Do socially responsible funds perform worse?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no, and the honest answer is that a screen changes what you own, so your returns will diverge from the broad market in both directions. A concrete example from this list: the 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund returned 7.53% over the year to June 30, 2026 in its Class A shares before any sales charge, against 15.70% for its blended benchmark of 70% S&P 500 and 30% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Over ten years the same share class returned 10.07% a year against 10.73% for the blend.
That is one fund over two periods, and it is not evidence about the category. It is evidence that excluding fossil fuels, weapons and tobacco is a real investment risk and a real active bet that can cost you in a year when those sectors run. A narrower screen also tends to raise volatility, because the fund holds fewer issuers and leans harder on the ones it keeps. Anyone who tells you SRI funds reliably beat the market is selling something, and so is anyone who tells you they reliably lose. Look at the fund’s own dated performance table against its stated benchmark before you decide.
What does an SRI mutual fund actually cost?
The expense ratio comes out of the fund’s assets every year whether it gains or loses. Here is what each fee level on this list takes from a $10,000 and a $50,000 position in a single year.
| Expense ratio | Funds at this level | Annual cost on $10,000 | Annual cost on $50,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.11% | FITLX, VFTAX | $11 | $55 |
| 0.35% | TSBIX (R6) | $35 | $175 |
| 0.73% | CSIBX | $73 | $365 |
| 0.79% | ATEYX | $79 | $395 |
| 0.81% | PRBLX | $81 | $405 |
| 0.95% | SSIAX (Class A) | $95 | $475 |
| 1.04% | DSEFX | $104 | $520 |
| 1.25% | NEXTX | $125 | $625 |
Sales charges are the part most lists leave out entirely. Class A shares of the 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund carry a front-end sales charge of up to 5.75%. Put $10,000 in and roughly $575 goes to the load, leaving about $9,425 working for you on day one. Calvert Bond Fund Class A shares also carry a front-end charge. The same strategy is usually available in a class without a load, so check which class your brokerage is actually selling you before you place the order.
Should you use a mutual fund or an ETF for SRI investing?
Use a mutual fund if you want automatic recurring investments in exact dollar amounts and you do not care about intraday pricing. Use an exchange-traded fund if you want a lower minimum, intraday trading and, usually, better tax efficiency in a taxable brokerage account. Most large providers now run an ESG mutual fund and a matching ETF against near-identical screens, so the wrapper is a separate decision from the investing strategy behind it.
Two exchange-traded funds turn up on almost every socially responsible mutual fund list, including the earlier version of this page, and they belong here instead of in the table above. The State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) charges 0.20% and strips companies that own fossil fuel reserves out of the S&P 500. The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) charges 0.39% and holds 137 clean energy companies worldwide; it is a concentrated sector fund, not a diversified core holding, and its top position alone was 12.75% of the portfolio in July 2026.
If ETFs are where you want to be, our roundups of ESG funds and fossil fuel free funds go deeper, and ESG target date funds covers the all-in-one option for retirement accounts.
How do you check an SRI fund before you buy it?
Five checks, in this order, take about fifteen minutes per fund and catch nearly everything a list article can get wrong. They matter more here than in a conventional fund because you are trying to build a long-term position in a category where the strategies and even the fund names keep moving.
- Search by ticker and land on the fund company’s own page. Names change; tickers rarely do.
- Read the strategy paragraph and evaluate whether the fund excludes, scores best-in-class, or buys for positive impact, and how it defines sustainable companies. If it does not say, treat that as an answer.
- Open the current holdings list and look for anything you specifically wanted excluded. A best-in-class ESG fund can invest in companies an exclusion fund would never touch, and seeing the actual names is what turns a marketing claim into an investment decision you can defend.
- Confirm the share class, the expense ratio, the minimum, and whether there is a front-end or deferred sales charge on the class you are being offered. Share class alone can change the cost of identical investment decisions by more than a percentage point.
- Check fund size and flows. A very small or shrinking fund in a category with 97 closures in a year is a fund that may liquidate on you.
What mistakes do socially responsible investors make most often?
- Buying the fund name. “Sustainable” on a fund is marketing copy, not a defined standard, which is what greenwashing looks like in practice, and the prospectus is the only correction.
- Assuming ESG means fossil free. Best-in-class funds keep energy companies with better scores than their peers, so zero fossil fuel exposure requires an exclusion screen you have verified in the holdings.
- Ignoring the share class. Two tickers can run one strategy with a fee gap above a percentage point plus a 5.75% load.
- Copying a list without a date on it. Four of the nine entries here have a renamed predecessor, so a list with no “verified as of” line is unusable.
- Stacking overlapping funds. FITLX, VFTAX, PRBLX and DSEFX all hold large U.S. companies and their top holdings look alike. Owning all four is concentration, not diversification.
How we chose and checked these funds
Every fund here had to be an open-end mutual fund open to U.S. retail investors, with a published social, environmental or governance screen, and it had to still exist under a verifiable ticker in August 2026. We took expense ratios, minimums, share class details, index names and asset totals from the fund companies themselves (Fidelity, Vanguard, Nuveen, Calvert, AllianceBernstein, Parnassus, 1919 Investment Counsel, Domini, Shelton Capital) and from index provider notices, and we recorded the date attached to each figure. Fund flow and closure counts come from Morningstar’s 2025 sustainable fund reporting. Holdings were checked against the most recent published portfolios instead of the descriptions used in older articles.
This update corrected five errors carried by the previous version of this page: an ETF listed as a mutual fund under a misspelled sponsor name, an obsolete fund name for TSBIX, an obsolete index name for VFTAX, an out-of-date expense ratio for PRBLX, and two holdings lists naming companies that no longer trade.
This article is information, not financial advice. Fund data changes constantly and expense ratios, minimums and holdings should be confirmed against the current prospectus before you invest. Consider speaking with a licensed financial professional about your own situation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the cheapest socially responsible mutual fund?
Among the funds on this list, FITLX and VFTAX tie at a 0.11% expense ratio. FITLX has no minimum investment, so it is the cheaper entry point for a small first purchase; VFTAX requires $3,000 for its Admiral shares.
Are socially responsible mutual funds fossil fuel free?
Not automatically. Exclusion funds such as VFTAX drop companies with fossil fuel reserves outright. Best-in-class ESG funds such as FITLX keep the sector and hold the higher-scoring companies within it. Check the holdings list, because the two approaches share a label and not much else.
Is there a socially responsible bond fund?
Yes. The Nuveen Core and Impact Bond Fund (TSBIX in its R6 class, 0.35%) and the Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX, 0.73%, $1,000 minimum) are two of the larger options. The Nuveen fund allocates specifically to bonds financing affordable housing, community development and renewable energy.
What is the difference between SRI, ESG and impact investing?
SRI usually means excluding what you object to. ESG usually means scoring companies on environmental, social and governance measures and favoring the leaders. Impact investing means putting money where the outcome is measurable and reported, such as a bond that funds a named housing project; impact investments in public markets are still mostly fixed income for that reason. Many funds blend all three, which is why the strategy section matters more than the label.
Do socially responsible funds vote proxies on my behalf?
Active SRI managers generally do, and several treat proxy voting and direct engagement with company boards as central to the strategy instead of a side activity. Index funds vote too, but according to a published policy rather than a fund-by-fund judgment. Fund companies publish their voting records, so you can check how a fund actually voted before you buy it.
Last updated August 6, 2026. Expense ratios, minimums, share classes, index names and asset totals re-verified against fund company disclosures; fund flow and closure data from Morningstar’s 2025 sustainable fund reporting. Five factual errors in the previous version were corrected and are listed in the methodology above.
Related reading
Screen every company in coverage & model portfolios
Use our audited rating engine to benchmark stocks against MSCI & Sustainalytics sustainability scores, or calculate clean energy ROI with our 11 financial calculators.